Buffalo Sabres It’s Time For a Line-Up Shake-Up

Prev1 of 6Next
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

How many games do the Buffalo Sabres have to lose before Ron Rolston understands that his current line-up isn’t working? He changes his lines during almost every game, yet goes back to those same lines in practice and for the next game. What gives, has the whole team threatened to stop playing if he changes the lines around?

If the lines he has come up with haven’t worked for 9 games then why does he stick with those lines? Any other coach would have shaken his lines up after just 2 losses and I’m not talking about just demoting a sluggish star to the fourth line. What the Buffalo Sabres need is a complete line-up shake-up and I’m talking drastic!

It’s time for Rolston to completely turn the Buffalo Sabres line-up upside down in an attempt to find some kind of momentum and chemistry, I mean what do they have to lose?

Here are the lines that I propose

Prev1 of 6Next
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Topics: Buffalo Sabres, Lines, Mikhail Grigorenko, NHL

Want more from Sabre Noise?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • Michael McBurney

    I’m entirely with you, especially where it goes to moving the pieces so that rookies get exposure to working with different vets (though it still seems weird to consider Foligno and Hodgson as “vets”?) and putting the vets into roles where they’re enabled to take on more responsibility for their lines. But I question some of the details… I’d switch your combos up a bit to account for five points…

    1) My understanding was that Foligno was almost slotted in with Hodgson-Vanek pre-season/injury, but even at that time there was the question of both guys wanting to play off the right side for passes from center (I got this from a Vanek comment at the time of the pre-season experimentation).

    2) Hodgson seems to defer to passing before shooting. Perhaps it’s a Vanek thing (ie: the kid simply defers to Vanek) or perhaps it’s that he leans to playmaking before goal scoring, dunno. But in either case, I’d for sure plug him in with some wings who aren’t just gonna make room for him but are closers themselves.

    3) I thought Girgensons is a centerman too, and just being integrated into the NHL in the wing spot for his own development?

    4) Ott hasn’t been doing a lot more than make room on the top line, but he’s been great in the dot and playing a generally solid shut-down role, which seems prime for a 3rd line center…

    5) Ice time… spread it out more. I’m a Hodgson fan so it’s great seeing him get the minutes, but for the sake of developing a whole “team”, then give guys roles (like Ott as a shutdown artist) and spread the minutes more…

    That leaves us with

    Vanek – Larrson – Girgensons
    (Larrson seems to look like a two-way guy, Girgs makes space and things happen)
    Foligno – Hodgson – Grigorenko
    (Hodgson’s pts may go down, but experience will count for more in the long term, Grigs/Hodgson can swap around in the dot depending on the game situation)
    Ennis – Ott – Stafford
    (with special teams and being used for checking + secondary scoring, these guys would get quality minutes and offensive opportunity too)
    Flynn – Porter – Scott

    • Caitlin Campbell

      I like your line’s I just don’t think moving Grigo to the wing is the best move for his development right now. He needs to focus on playing centre and I think Larsson is more versitle to move to the wing.
      I too am a Hodgson fan… nice to find another one out there!

      • Michael McBurney

        Hmmm… so like swap Larrson for Grigorenko? I *do* like Larrson in the dot (leads all reg. centers with 56%), but your idea might make for something very interesting…

        Vanek – Grigorenko – Girgensons
        Foligno – Hodgson – Larrson
        Ennis – Ott – Stafford
        Flynn – Porter – Scott

        And yeah, I’m a total Hodgson fan, just trying not to have my blinders on at the risk of seeing if some of the rookies might ultimately prove better at 1C (which is hard, cuz I really like my Hodgson blinders!;-)).

        • Caitlin Campbell

          I hear ya, I grew up playing hockey with Hodgson so I’m pretty partial to the man haha. I think he will be overtaken by the youngsters eventually though, but he’s still a solid 2/3C.
          Yup I like those lines they make things pretty interesting

          • Michael McBurney

            “playing hockey with Hodgson”? As in “with” the kid? Now *that* sounds like a story ;-)

            But yeah, I can see him as a 2C anyway. 3C depending on the depth. But then that makes for some pretty decent depth!

          • Caitlin Campbell

            Yes Sir, I have been on the ice playing hockey with Cody Hodgson himself. I played hockey with his sisters for years and whenever he was in town he’d join us for practices, play some shinny with us and participate in our “family” game every year. I have personally stopped a Cody Hodgson shot haha

  • Ryan G. King

    I agree with the lines for the most part. Just switch the wings on the 2nd and third line Ennis-CoHo-Staff. Having a checking 3rd line of Zemgus-Larson-Ott would be epic. Besides I never thought was a top 6 forward at any point.

    • Caitlin Campbell

      I just don’t want Staff to draft CoHo down with him, but CoHo and Ennis together could be dangerous for sure. Oh man Girgs-Larsson and Ott could be solid

  • lee Munn

    I agree with you COMPLETELY… The hard part will be in 2 weeks with Armia/Lieno/Kaleta & McCormick returning. If they are keeping Kaleta for’ P.K. and agitating’ (his main/only strength) they will have to send down or loose Scott or McCormick… I would rather keep McCormick up as our sit or play hardman, not the strongest on offense but a much better 2 way Player/Fighter.

    • lee Munn

      If Grigs does not look stronger with playing with Fol/Van then I would send back to Ramparts for remainder of year.. Most all say he can’t learn anymore in QMJHL. But better than playing 6 mins a game with Scott & Kaleta

      • Caitlin Campbell

        yup having him lighting up the QMJHL would be better than keeping him stuck with Scott

    • Caitlin Campbell

      The line-up is going to get pretty messy in the next 2 weeks for sure… who go’s where will be the big question. Obviously Leino isn’t going anywhere but will this force the Sabres to send Grigo back to the Q?

  • Jes

    I think Ennis would be the better fit on the first line (He’ll add a lot of speed to that line), and Foligno on the third line. Other than that, all is good. When Tropp and Leino come back I’d send down Porter and McCormick.

    • Caitlin Campbell

      We’re not going to agree about Foligno are we? I think he shouild see some time on the top line, but I can’t argue with Ennis’ speed on that line

TEAMFeed More Sabres news from the Fansided Network

Hot on the Web From golf.com